The Crucible By Arthur Miller - 1117 Words

The earliest dramatic works enlisted the use of a three act structure, consisting of Aristotle’s divisions of a beginning, middle, and end. These divisions were later named by Aelius Donatus, a Roman, and were given the names Protasis, Epitasis, and Catastrophe. In the midst of the European Renaissance in the 1500s, Shakespeare developed the five act structure, consisting of an exposition, a rising action, a climax, a falling action, and a final resolution. This became the standard structure for plays of the time and in years to come. The Crucible by Arthur Miller was written as a parallel between the Salem Witch Trials of 1692 and the fear of communism that was widespread through the United States after the Second World War. Although it was written with a four act structure, the plot of the play is able to fit the standard five act structure. Act I of The Crucible is primarily the exposition, with the introduction of vital characters such as Abigail Williams, John Procto r, Reverend Parris, and Reverend Hale. The setting of Salem, Massachusetts in the year 1692 is specified through some of the dialogue and through the brief backstory of the trials that is provided for the audience before the play begins. Conflict is also introduced, particularly through the revelation of the affair between Abigail Williams and John Proctor, as well as the direct quote from Betty Parris, who said ‘You drank a charm to kill Goody Proctor!’ This illustrated the resentment and jealousyShow MoreRelatedThe Crucible By Arthur Miller1269 Words   |  6 PagesAt first glance, the playwright Arthur Miller in The Crucible highlights the historical significance of the Salem Witch Trials of 1692, but in fact it is an allegorical expression of his perception of McCarthyism. If the reader has some background information on Arthur Miller’s victimization as a communist, it is evident that the play is a didactic vessel illustrating the flaws of the court syst em in the 1950’s. The communist allegations were launched at government employees, entertainers and writersRead MoreThe Crucible By Arthur Miller1681 Words   |  7 Pagesof their way to the last dying breath to make sure they leave with a good or bad reputation. In one of the recent literature study in class â€Å"The Crucible† by Arthur Miller, Miller uses characterization to illustrate reputation throughout the play. â€Å"The Crucible† takes place in Salem, Massachusetts. It is based upon the Salem witch trails. In â€Å"The Crucible†, we journey through the life of three characters who reputations plays a major role in the play. The three characters are John Proctor, AbigailRead MoreThe Crucible By Arthur Miller1333 Words   |  6 PagesAs the various characters in The Crucible by Arthur Miller interact, the dominant theme of the consequences of women’s nonconformity begins to slide out from behind the curtains of the play. Such a theme reve als the gripping fear that inundated the Puritans during the seventeenth century. This fear led to the famous witch-hunts that primarily terrorized women who deviated from the Puritan vision of absolute obedience and orthodoxy. Arthur Miller presents his interpretation of the suffering by subtlyRead MoreThe Crucible By Arthur Miller998 Words   |  4 Pagesmotivated by jealousy and spite. The Crucible is a four-act dramatic play production that was first performed on January 22, 1953. Arthur Miller used dialogue within the characters to cover the multiple themes; conflicts and resolutions, plus the few directions for the different actions of the play. The Salem Witch Trials were intended to be performed as the play however, when read, it can be more carefully examined and broken down to analyze the techniques. Miller, the playwright, uses literaryRead MoreThe Crucible By Arthur Miller1145 Words   |  5 PagesUnbalance Through The Centuries In Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, the author reflects the persecution of communists in America in the 1950’s through a recount of the Salem witch trials. It is often presumed that Miller based his drama directly off of events that were particularly prevalent in the years surrounding the publication of The Crucible- which was released in the year 1953, towards the conclusion of the Korean War. Although there was not a literal witch hunt occurring during this timeRead MoreThe Crucible By Arthur Miller1063 Words   |  5 PagesIn the English dictionary, there are three definitions of the word crucible. One is a metal container in which metals are mixed and melted. Another is a severe test. But the third definition, and the one that I think fits the best for this book, is a place or situation in which different elements interact to create something new. In my mind, this fits because all of the characters had their little grudges and dirty secrets. But when all th ose seemingly little things interact, they formed somethingRead MoreThe Crucible By Arthur Miller1285 Words   |  6 Pages Rationale, Morality, Stereotypes, Pressure, Self-Censorship, Unanimity, and Mindguards. Groupthink has also taken place in our history a a country. The play, The Crucible by Arthur Miller is about a the real-life Salem Witch Trials that happened in 1692 - 1693, in Salem, Massachusetts. Some symptoms of Groupthink found in the Crucible are Rationale, Pressure, and Self-Censorship. The Groupthink symptom, Rationale, is described as when victims of Groupthink ignore warnings: they also collectivelyRead MoreThe Crucible By Arthur Miller811 Words   |  4 Pages While The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, is only a four act play, it still resembles the format of a five act play. The five-act structure evolved from a three-act structure, which was made famous by Roman Aelius Donatus. Donatus came up with three types of plays: Protasis, Epitasis, and Catastrophe. The five-act structure helped to expand the three act structure, mainly made famous by Shakespeare through his many tragedies. Even though The Crucible contains only four acts, it still has the commonRead MoreThe Crucible By Arthur Miller1052 Words   |  5 PagesBuddy Al-Aydi Ms.Healy English 9 CP 14th October 2014 The Crucible Essay The Crucible was a novel written by Arthur Miller in the 1950’s. It was written in a format of the play, portraying an allegory of the Salem Witch-Hunts led by Senator Joseph McCarthy. The book is known to have a inexplicable plot. This plot is advanced by multiple characters in the book in order to ensure that the reader maintains interest with the material that is being read. The farmer, John Proctor, would be theRead MoreThe Crucible By Arthur Miller841 Words   |  4 PagesThe Crucible is a chaotic play, throughout this American classic Arthur Miller takes the reader through multiple events of terror and insanity. While creating a great on-stage play, Arthur Miller portrays his life through the events, the characters, and plot of The Crucible. Using vivid imagery and comprehensible symbolism, Miller manipulates the real personalities of the characters and events in 1600 Salem, Massachusetts to create a symbolic autobiography. Throughout this play, the reader experie nces

Analytical Awakening Voltaires Candide - 1958 Words

Voltaire’s satirical novella Candide tells the story a young man who, having been raised in a secluded utopia and educated in philosophical optimism, is suddenly thrust into the world and forced to make sense of the evil and suffering around him that he has always been taught to reason away. As his journey progresses and he encounters numerous horrors, Candide increasingly struggles to accept his tutor’s theory that all is for the best, and it ultimately becomes apparent that he has lost faith in his tutor’s philosophy. I argue that Candide’s gradual loss of faith in his tutor, Pangloss, was the result of the contradictions he increasingly observed between Pangloss’ philosophy and his lived experiences. This loss of faith in Pangloss’†¦show more content†¦While Candide initially tried his hardest to make his experiences fit into the paradigm that all was for the best, it grew increasingly difficult for him to do so, until he ultimate ly reached the point where he could no longer reconcile his preconceived optimistic beliefs with his own lived experiences. While examples of this conflict between Pangloss’ philosophy and Candide’s experiences are numerous in Candide, it will be useful to consider a few of the most significant in order to observe Candide’s gradual loss of faith in his tutor. As mentioned, throughout his journey Candide attempted to reconcile his experiences with the theory that all is for the best, and in his early instances, he succeeded. When Jacques— the kind man who had taken in Candide and Pangloss— was thrown overboard during a storm, for example, Pangloss stopped Candide from rescuing him by explaining that it was for the best and â€Å"proving that the bay of Lisbon had been formed expressly for this Anabaptist to drown in.† Here, Candide accepted Pangloss’ explanation with virtually no resistance. Significantly, not long after this incident Candide was separated from Pangloss, and it was in the wake of this separation that Candide began to struggle with Pangloss’ explanations for the horrors he witnessed. To be sure, he still tried his hardest to make them fit— in nearly every situation Candide encountered, he made reference to Pangloss’ teachings and considered how Pangloss would

Importance of Salomon V A Salomon-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Discuss the legal basis of the statement Explain the Salomon v A Salomon And Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 case. How is this case incorporated in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)? Answer: Introduction A corporation is considered as an artificial person in the eyes of the law means it has several rights and liability including the right to own property, sue or being sued, enter into a contract and issues shares to raise capital. A company has separate legal entity from its owners and directors meaning they cannot be held liable for the actions of the organisation. The concept of an independent entity was introduced in Salomon v A Salomon And Co Ltd case. This report will focus on analysing the legal basis of the provision of the different legal entity in the corporations law. The importance of Salomon v A Salomon And Co Ltd case will be discussed in the report as well. Further, the future and necessity of separate legal entity act will be addressed in the report. Artificial Legal Person Artificial legal person means an entity which is not a human being, who is recognised by the law as legitimate being and has a separate identity, character, rights, and duties. As per Banerjee (2008), a company is considered as an artificial legal person as per Corporations Act 2001; it has several rights and liabilities which can be enforced by the court. An enterprise is regarded as unnatural because it did not have physical parts or brain to function as a natural person, therefore the business is operated by directors and members. The identity of an organisation is different from those people who run its operations. A company is liable for its actions rather than the persons who operate its operation (Archer and Karim 2009). The rights and liability of corporations are originated from the law, right after its incorporation. For incorporating organisations, it is necessary that the company is registered under the Corporation Act 2001, which provides provision regarding various rights and duties of an enterprise. As per section 112, the companies are divided into two parts by the act, public and proprietary. The public corporations are divided into two parts: Limited by Shares Unlimited with share capital There are four types of proprietary companies: No Liability Limited by Shares Limited by Guarantee Unlimited with share capital Legal Basis of Separate Entity The separate legal entity is a concept regarding corporations which is globally applicable over companies. This principle provides that an enterprise is considered as independent being from its members. According to Ramsay and Noakes (2001), a separate existence meaning corporation can buy or sell the property, enter into a legal contract, sue or be sued, and raise investment under its name. The peoples, who operate and decide for the companys transactions, cannot be held liable towards the actions of an enterprise. Being an artificial person, the various principle of natural human being did not apply to corporations, for example, a company cannot die, and therefore it has perpetual succession. The entity of corporate cannot be altered by a change in its management, even after the death of each member, the existence of corporation remains the same in the eyes of the law. As per Rose (2013), in Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd [1925] AC 619 case, the insurance claim of a person was rejected by six insurers because the property was under the name of corporations. The court provided that even if a person holds all the shares in businesses, he still cannot be considered as the corporations because the company has a separate entity from its owners and members. This case proves the principle that an organisation can hold a property under its name and all the rights of such property shall be the companys rights (Noussia 2008). The companys right to enter into a legal agreement was provided in Lee v Lees Air Farming Ltd [1960] UKPC 33 case, in which Lee formed the corporations, and he was also the director and principal shareholder of such organisation. The companies enter into a contract with farmers to provide the service of aerial topdressing. Lee died while performing the work and his wife file for workers compensation because Lee works in his company as an employee (Baragwanath 2012). The insurance companies denied the claim by stating that Lee was the director of such corporation. The court provided that never assume an enterprise to be a scam; a company has its own identity which cannot be changed merely because Lee was the director of such business. This case also provides the right of the company to employ worker under its name (Barrett 2016). These examples show the importance of separate legal entity principle in the corporation law. Salomon v A Salomon And Co Ltd The provision of the separate legal entity was first introduced in R v Arnaud (1846) 9 QB 806 case, in which the court provided that a corporation has an independent body which cannot be mix with the existence of its owners (Kouo 2016). But, Salomon v A Salomon And Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 was considered as the landmark case in establishing the principle of separate legal entity worldwide. The fact of this case is: Salomon sold his shoe business to another company which was founded by him. The shareholders of the company include his family members and Salomon himself. Salomon transferred the debentures of 10,000 of the company to another party. The business of organisation did not perform well, and it went into insolvent liquidation (Amaeshi, Osuji and Nnodim 2008). The liquidator provided that Mr. Salomon was liable towards the creditors because he conducted fraud and take all their money. The court of appeal provided a similar judgement by holding Mr. Salomon personally accountable for corporations debts. The House of Lord gave a unanimous decision that Mr. Salomon was neither liable towards company nor the creditors (Ping and Wing 2011). The debentures issued by Salomon were valid, and he tried his best to avoid the liquidation of the company. The court decided that the corporation has separate entity from Mr. Salomon, and he cannot be held liable towards the debt of the creditors. As per Anderson (2009), the Salomon v A Salomon And Co Ltd case has significant influence over the Corporations Act 2001 because it introduced the policy of corporate veil which protects companys members from being personally liable. Future of Corporation Law The provision of separate legal entity is a century old principle which is applicable globally over corporations. The ridged provision of corporate veil is still relevant to the enterprises. With the popularity of globalisation, the number of companies has grown substantially along with competition. Many corporations use this principle to conduct fraud in the organisation to gain an unfair advantage. Due to the rigidity of this rule, many people suffer loss from actions of enterprises. To avoid this issue, the doctrine of Piercing of corporate veil has been provided by the law. This principle enables the court to pierce or lift the corporate veil and hold the directors liable for their acts (OSullivan, Percy and Stewart 2008). Many experts believe that the concept of separate entity should be dismissed because the directors take all the decision for a company. Thus, they should be held liable for its illegal actions. But in the future, the doctrine of separate identity will not vanish because due to this principle a company has various benefits. Due to the independent legal entity, a corporation has perpetual succession which is necessary the growth of the business. People prefer to invest in firms because they do not help personally liable for its actions, for the growth of companies in the future, the doctrine of separate legal entity is necessary. Requirement of Changes Due to globalisation and modernisation in a business environment, there is a requirement of changing in regulations regarding the corporate veil. In the present scenario, the role of the doctrine of corporate veil is crucial to protect the interest of the public. This principle restrains corporations from misusing the provision of corporate veil and takes unfair advantage of the public interest. In the swiftly changing business environment, the requirement of strict regulations is necessary to protect the benefit of the public. The doctrine of corporate veil is essential for the growth of corporations, but better laws are in need to control the illegal transaction of the firms. The government should change the rules and bring more strictness in the existing rules regarding corporate veil. The directors should be stopped from taking the wrongful assistance of various provision to save society from misleading practices (Matheson 2008). Conclusion In conclusion, the separate existence principle is a century old rule which is still necessary for the growth of the modern organisation. This law assists companies to perform their actions as a different legal person from its members, and it also provides perpetual succession to a corporation. Many enterprises misuse this doctrine to gain an unfair advantage from the society. The policy of piercing of corporate veil assists the court in checking the person liable for companys actions and held him personally accountable for his acts. In the future, the requirement of strict policy is necessary to avoid the misuse of corporate veil provision which will help in the protection of societys interest. References Amaeshi, K.M., Osuji, O.K. and Nnodim, P., 2008. Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications.Journal of Business ethics,81(1), pp.223-234. Anderson, H., 2009. Piercing the veil on corporate groups in Australia: the case for reform.Melb. UL Rev.,33, p.333. Archer, S. and Karim, R.A.A., 2009. Profit-sharing investment accounts in Islamic banks: Regulatory problems and possible solutions.Journal of Banking Regulation,10(4), pp.300-306. Banerjee, S.B., 2008. Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly.Critical sociology,34(1), pp.51-79. Baragwanath, D., 2012. The Later Privy Council and a Distinctive New Zealand Jurisprudence: Curb or Spur.Victoria U. Wellington L. Rev.,43, p.147. Barrett, J., 2016. Employee-citizens of the human rights state.New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations (Online),41(2), p.21. Kouo, C., 2016. Post-Prest Corporate Group Veil Piercing: Alternative Avenues to Justice.Legal Issues J.,4, p.65. Matheson, J.H., 2008. The modern law of corporate groups: An empirical study of piercing the corporate veil in the parent-subsidiary context. Noussia, K., 2008. Insurable Interest in Marine Insurance Contracts: Modern Commercial Needs Versus Tradition.J. Mar. L. Com.,39, p.81. OSullivan, M., Percy, M. and Stewart, J., 2008. Australian evidence on corporate governance attributes and their association with forward-looking information in the annual report.Journal of Management Governance,12(1), pp.5-35. Ping, Z. and Wing, C., 2011. Corporate governance: A summary review on different theory approaches.International Research Journal of Finance and Economics,68, pp.7-13. Ramsay, I. and Noakes, D.B., 2001. Piercing the corporate veil in Australia. Rose, F., 2013.Marine insurance: law and practice. CRC press.